Chapter 12: Imperfect Competition
- Introduction
- Basic Concepts
- In the long run:
- monopolistic competition will be inefficient mainly due to excess capacity
- tendency for zero economic profits at average total cost equals profit maximizing level of output
- Allocative Inefficiency
- identified by P > MC (price > marginal cost)
- tendency to price thing at a higher level than the costs to produce additional units
- Output level restricted in order to maximize profits
- optimal at MR = MC
- results in higher price and less output in the long run
- Stronger barriers to entry under oligopoly than under monopolistic competition
- Monopolistic competition characterized by:
- non-price competition
- advertising
- unique products
- warranties
- coupons
- appeal to brand or store names
- differentiated products
- innovation
- large number of buyers and sellers
- few barriers to entry and exit
- Under oligopoly, more interdependence of the firms
- rivals match price decreases but not increases
- more true for the noncollusive model
- Charge higher prices than needed to maximize profits
- When merger activity increases, the structure, behavior, and performance of oligopolists comes into play on policy decisions
- Monopolistic Competition
- Summary
- The most common (but not most dominant) type of market structure in the U.S.
- Relatively easy entry
- Differentiated products
- Advertising, non price competition
- Large number of buyers and sellers
- Long run equilibrium: zero economic profits
- Allocatively inefficient: price > MC
- P > MR: price strategy, price-makers
- Inefficient, excess capacity
- Oligopoly: The Non-Collusive Kinked Demand Model
- Basics
- Rivals may base their strategies in part on the anticipated reactions of other firms
- The kinked demand curve assumes:
- there are no collusive activities among the rival oligopolists
- there is no price leader
- there are relatively equal market shares among the rival oligopolists
- Alternative Characteristics of Other Oligopoly Markets
- Price leadership
- the dominant firm can set the price to maximize profits
- other firms follow since they are virtually unable to gain market share by maintaining price
- Cooperative noncollusive activities
- tacit understandings about the value of limited advertising, promotion, etc.
- much of this is based on the interdependence of oligopolists
- Collusive Oligopolies
- rivals may divide markets among themselves according to regional areas or product specializations
- include agreements to charge the same or higher prices
- cartels
- price-makers
- may have production limits or price agreements among its members in an effort to set or control prices
- ex: OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries)
- Nash Equilibrium
- The strategy of each player is the best choice based on the strategy of the other player
- A game theory
- John Nash- mathematician
- Summary: Oligopoly
- Formidable barriers to entry
- Differentiated or similar product
- Interdependence
- Few firms, controlling major shares of market
- Allocatively inefficient
- P > MC, excess profits
- Price > marginal revenue indicating pricing strategy and non-price competition
- Price-makers
- Collusive activities and cooperative arrangements
- dominant type of market structure in U.S. industry
- Firms more likely to follow a price decrease than increase
You just finished Chapter 12: Imperfect Competition. Nice work!
Previous ChapterNext Chapter
Tip: Use ← → keys to navigate!
How to cite this note (MLA)
Aboukhadijeh, Feross. "Chapter 12: Imperfect Competition" StudyNotes.org. Study Notes, LLC., 13 Oct. 2013. Web. 15 Jan. 2025. <https://www.apstudynotes.org/microeconomics/outlines/chapter-12-imperfect-competition/>.